Err.. nevermind
2008-06-02 15:46:12
Forget linux. I tried out Kubuntu and it performed so very poorly. Worse, in fact, than Windows Vista on my grossly underpowered work computer. Here's a breakdown:

- Booted up slowly. I didn't time it, but it was a lot longer than previously mentioned work computer.

- Konqueror crashed every time I closed it.

- The craptacular nvidia driver package somehow made my monitor only usable at 50hz and 51hz refresh rate. It was really hard on the eyes. Xorg was fine with it before I installed the driver, but alas then there was no fun 3D acceleration.

- Dragon Player crashed repeatedly.

- GVim was nowhere to be found even though I installed it.

- General desktop performance was laggy at best. Doing a multi-select drag would draw the selection rect in increments -- not smoothly. Moving a window also lagged. Resizing a window was a joke. Things seemed slightly better with compositing effects on. Maybe I was just fooled by all the pretties.

- Firefox *killed* the KDE panel (aka taskbar to us windows losers).

- The network config would run at start, but would sit there until i checked on its status and only then would it connect to dhcp. As a side note, I couldn't figure out how to use a static ip. The best I could tell, the network configuration options from KDE3 were not present.

- My Logitech G5 laser mouse was rendered pointless. The mouse wheel worked. I can't remember if the wheel button worked, but the tilt buttons and side button definitely didn't. After following some other Xorg configurations for the G5, nothing changed.

- The system idled at 10% CPU. That's just unacceptable. Plenty of ram, disk space and umph (no swap in use). Idling is very taxing apparently.

Don't get me wrong, I actually really like KDE4. With the exception of gvim and a lot of the configuration options, I found it very pleasing to use. Stability and performance definitely need work however. But I suppose it can only be as good as its underlying platform...

Kubuntu on the other is a miserable waste of space. I find out later that it's known for performance issues. I was about to give Debian another shot when I remembered that it took me about a month to get it in usable shape the last time. I don't feel like spending that amount of time on setting up anything.

I may, in the future, go with FreeBSD for desktop. I was always happy with it, and we seemed to just get one another. But music creation options are limited, so it'll have to wait for a while.


Anyway, forget the last post. Back on Windows. Gonna try and finish stuff.

Name:

Message:

security question
Answer:

2008-06-07 03:03:18 AwesomeAnDrEw
Oops! I just realized I did not clear the TEXTAREA field where I had begun writing before posting :-[.

2008-06-07 03:01:46 AwesomeAnDrEw
sloat, all versions of Microsoft Windows operating systems (with the exclusion of 3.1 and possibly 95's edition) allow for the performance to be tweaked and enhanced through several different methods, and believe me they do indeed help. Generally when I make a clean install, or try to optimize another individual's computer without getting too involved with the hardware aspects, I run "Hijack This" to enumerate all of the Browser Helper Objects, Toolbars, ActiveX files, applications running on startup, remove all of the unnecessary clutter, and then move to the services configuration. By default there are a lot of resource-wasting applications running in the background, and so I look through each service and then set ones I may possibly need to "manual" while disabling others completely. This is a great way to free up RAM, and minimize certain plugins' impacts on the computer.
Next I deal with visual effects, both "documented" and "undocumented". I remove all of the quick-launch icons from the toolbar as apparently those have a small effect (or so I have read, but I don't use them anyhow), enable the classic menus, set the theme to "Windows Classic", adjust the system properties' "Performance" settings so that there are no forms of animation, and then set the swap/page file to 3 times the amount of RAM actually contained within the computer. After this I run an additional utility to modify other aspects that aren't easily found such as:

sloat, every single edition of the Windows operating system created by Microsoft (possibly with the exclusion of 3.1) allow for the performance of general applications to be greatly increased through various tweaks and enhancement methods, which do indeed help tremendously, and also positively impact the overall reliability, stability, and usability of the system without addressing any additional hardware issues. Whenever I freshly install Windows on my own computers, or on older computers owned by other individuals, the first thing I do is execute "Hijack This", which allows one to quickly scan a number of sections in the registry in order to enumerate all Browser Helper Objects, toolbars, ActiveX files (included in the browser), software that runs at startup, and many other areas where both legitimate and malware files are known to create issues. I remove all unnecessary clutter keeping only what is required to properly maintain Windows along with a few select applications. Next I tackle the services (services.msc), because by default there are quite a lot of resource-intensive, and resource-wasting tasks operating in the background, and so I go through each one setting flexible important ones to "Manual" while disabling others in their entirety (such as "Tablet PC" when most desktops and laptops do not include these features). These are a simple yet great way to free up RAM, and minimize certain plugins' footprints or impacts on the computer.
Proceeding along I deal with the visual effects and aspects of the operating system, both easily accessible, and "undocumented". I have read that quick-launch buttons on the taskbar do use a lot more memory than one would think, but being as how I do not use them anyway I opt to remove them before setting the taskbar panel to appear as the "classic" one did, and disable highlighting of newer programs. I then set the theme to "Windows Classic" (goodbye rounded-windows), and adjust the system properties' "Performance" settings under the advanced tab so that the system is modified for best performance (no window animations or other effects). Then I run an additional utility to address the menus' delay time, look, and a few other options effecting everything from how the text appears to Internet Explorer's maximum simultaneous connections, or the number of half-open sockets. After this I modify the swap/page file to a customized setting which is about three times greater than the total amount of RAM I have. There are literally hundreds of other ways to enhance the speed of the system as well such as setting the graphics card for performance, disabling the file indexing option (this allocates more RAM for free use, but takes longer to search for files), disabling superfetch, or even the compatibility engine used in Vista. All other portions of the computer such as specific software can also be configured for performance. Like I said, it doesn't take very long to do all of these, and although I have not updated the Windows Experience Index on my laptop it is currently a 3.1. The ratings are out of 10 I believe, and your score can never be greater than the lowest value which you have attained.
As for the CAPTCHA I find it to be interesting, because instead of a combination of characters which can easily be recognized by OCR technology, and instead of compromising your usability by making it overly difficult in order to fight the character recognition issue you have instead created a simple way to prove that a poster is a human as opposed to a bot. I cannot remember off-hand what the last question I received was, but I believe it was to choose a real word out of a few groups of characters. This one is a "True or False" scenario, which again is easy to use. I'm not an expert on CAPTCHA methods, but I'm going to present your CAPTCHA on sla.ckers and see what they think of it in terms of overall effectiveness.

2008-06-06 11:49:12 sloat
This is Vista Home basic (on my work computer), so I don't even know if my version of Vista supports performance tweaking. :\

My Windows experience score is 3.3. I assume that's out of a total of 75.0 points cause they don't really say.

The CAPTCHA is custom. I'm not sure how well it works, i thought i saw some more spam comments, but they could be manual spam. (spamanual? spamual?) I can make the source available if you'd like, but it's designed to be a plugin for CakePHP.

2008-06-05 16:08:54 AwesomeAnDrEw
I am more of a Windows person myself (colliqually referred to as a Windowsfag), but that is mainly due to the fact that it has always supported everything I have ever wanted to do. I do however run VMWare on ocassion using FreeBSD/PCBSD, BackTrack 2, and Windows 98SE (I use it as a development environment). I have never had any issues with Vista as far as performance goes, but I have thoroughly cleaned the registry, removed all unnecessary BHOs and ActiveX toolbars, disabled all unneeded services, deleted many of the programs wishing to run on startup, set every setting on the graphics card and operating system to "Performance", regularly defragment my drives, and replaced much of the utilities with light-weight alternatives. All in all it's about a half-hour worth of work, but it's decent. By the way is this a custom CAPTCHA, or is it available somewhere on the internet?

2008-06-03 01:36:44 patorjk
I used to have a dual boot of Windows XP and Ubuntu. I found Ubuntu to be pretty slick. Sorry to here you had such a bad experience with Kubuntu.

Latest Files
  1. ZAMN Editor - "Zurfl" - 2008-07-29 11:42:42
  2. Find and Replace - 2008-05-16 11:14:45
  3. Luhn Validation - 2008-03-12 09:38:16
  4. Drawing - 2008-01-07 14:01:36
  5. Pipe Demo - 2007-12-19 14:59:44